All,
jmac's post, depicting my reappearance here as, "popping out of the blue to personally attack him", is as usual, erroneous. While jmac may experience my comments as "personal attacks", my main purpose was to inform, and caution, new readers that I still consider jmac's posts to be MISLEADING AND ILL-INFORMED. Having taken a three month hiatus from posting on this thread, I was amazed to find jmac's proclivity and desire to proliferate garbage, to be un-abating. What disturbs me most is the arrogance and certainty in which his posts are cloaked. While his investment vocabulary appears adequate, I fear this could be misleading to new investors, those with less experience, who might mistakenly take his posts as educated good advise .
What prompted my latest post to jmac, was his suggestion that some shareholders might consider suing Intel for disseminating misinformation for devious motives. While jmac quickly pointed out, less we be confused, that he is not one of them, I ask him who then are these stockholders he is referring to that might consider suing Intel, if not him? No one else brought up this posibility.
In actuality though, I find jmac's posts to be useful. When employed properly, jmac's posts can be taken as a great counter- indicator to the short term direction of Intel's stock. He has an uncanny ability to confuse and misinterpret facts, which he frequently combines with irrational and emotional swings between exuberance and panic. These irrational swings therefore, should be viewed as an excellent indicator of the direction that less informed novice investors will take. Quite frankly, after batting almost 1000 % for being wrong in the short term, over the last six months, I am amazed that jmac still has money left to play his "trading games".
Jules |
