SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (88279)3/1/2001 9:48:43 PM
From: Big Dog  Read Replies (4) of 95453
 
Excerpt from Raymond James report:

Long-term natural gas contracts

As we detailed in a previous Stat, a plan emerged a few weeks ago to have the State of California purchase
electric power on behalf of California’s two largest investor-owned electric utilities. These purchases are widely
expected to be five- to 10-year purchased power agreements with wholesale electric producers, totaling over $10
billion when all is said and done. We believe the California power bailout will trigger the reemergence of long-term
gas and power contracts. In other words, we believe this creates a new paradigm shift in gas prices and
metrics used to evaluate North American energy companies. Based on the latest round of bids in the California
wholesale power market, the average price for power is $60 per MWH.
Five- to 10-year power contracts of $60 per megawatt-hour would justify power producers paying $6 per mmbtu
for natural gas over the next several years. This will clearly have a profound effect on the way the market looks at
and evaluates energy companies. As the convergence between the gas and power markets continues to
strengthen each day, we would anticipate coincident long-term natural gas contracts to be signed at levels well
above current price forecasts. Clearly, the result of creating a floor price for natural gas of around $5 cannot be
stressed enough. Drilling activity for natural gas would soar to record levels and E&P companies would be much
more aggressive in seeking out projects, as much of the uncertainty regarding future natural gas prices would be
removed.

Conclusion

It seems obvious to us that the combination of increased earnings visibility, upward budget revisions, the Bush
administration’s energy plan, and long-term natural gas contracts all point to an even stronger year in 2001 for the
oilservice group. The energy sector as a whole should provide a safe haven for money managers this year if the
economy continues to show signs of slowing growth and a possible recession looming on the horizon. Overall,
we believe the oilservice group will continue to post record earnings and profits in 2001 and is poised for another
good year.

Full report at:
raymondjames.com

big
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext