Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: YlangYlangBreeze who wrote (6984)	3/1/2001 10:20:14 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 82486

So, how about a single move that could reduce abortions by 50% in one fell swoop? A report at the NARAL site cites a 1992 source as saying that over the counter availability of "Emergency Contraceptive" or "Morning After" pills could do just that. Heck even if it was 5% percent I'd be in favor of it. Remember that MAP is not abortion because the woman is not yet pregnant, or it wouldn't work. By the technical definition of pregnancy the woman might not be pregnant. However I can't think of any moral signifigance to implantation. Conception is when a new life form starts. I understand that the "morning after pill" sometimes works by preventing ovulation rather then by preventing implantation but I would think that this would be 50% or less of the cases that it is used. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next