SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (7118)3/2/2001 10:55:22 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
Actually, IDT is not particularly specious at all, as "specious" implies a false plausibility. Nor is it necessary to examine biochemical processes to raise obvious questions. Evolution cannot adequately explain why we have multicellular animals, rather than several varieties of paramecia floating about. When one considers the phenomenon of cell differentiation leading to complex systems (skeletal, nervous,cardiovascular, for example), it strains credulity to believe they developed incrementally, much less randomly. If, in fact, it is impossible for them to come into being incrementally, than there is no choice but to believe in Intelligent Design. I will, however, wave that, and simply say that Intelligent Design is a plausible theory, and should give anyone pause......
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext