But on this Earth, yes, I am saying that man is the center of the action, not merely for himself, but as intended
by the Designer, and that the drive to improve, learn, invent are important to the underlying intention of things.
Among other things.
You and I were talking the other day about shared visions for society. They were certainly compatible, apparently quite similar. Yet I think that man is way too anthropocentric for his own (and Earth's) good and I totally dismiss this Designer.
So why, on this Earth, in this society, in the here and now, does it matter whether evolution or IDT or neither or both turns out to be correct?
Karen |
