OTN (nose)
minor correction ?? lived side by side for many hundreds of
thousands of years or more??
Point that the latest 33,000 years (some consensus
on some findings??) are mainly a blip-blip on the screen.
Personally I think the neanderthal just took over the game,
this now seen by the latest asian problems with
fashion models, etc which favor big, ugly noses, as well
as oversized sillycones.
(this opinion is mostly motivated by regular anarchism
against counting bumps of the head, cranial and other
volumes and especially ability to pass "IQ"-tests scaled and
tweaked to produce what the tweakers use to prove that their
tweaks are the correct ones, not even the basic mechanism of
transistors and transistor-Shockley.. Shannon at least had
fun juggling)
Clearly a big nose gives hope of other big things, just
look at the Clinton model, in spite of the old truth
"it dont mean a thing, if it aint got that swing"
(but the real anthropologize-me thing is the size of
the bony part, as flesh and carthiledge(?) do not
preserve as easily, not even the bodily parts of
mummies, another mystery of bodily statistics and
puberty frustrations, how could the usually
very accurate pyramide egyptians miss that much portraying
some bodily pharaoinic parts)
Ilmarinen
P.S. If nothing else, "it" "is" fun... but probably have
importance for the design of handsets
(I once caused an instant blush of a bunch of american women
by asking how it felt to hold a Nokia phone in their hand,
that first one with the "organic design", not the regular
square, cheap plastic remote controller, like ericsson) |
