Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (7380)	3/5/2001 11:18:46 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 82486

Has hospice been discussed in this context? "Are you say that we negate a person only when we kill him but do not negate him when we deny him his humanity by making him a slave, experimenting on him without his consent, subjecting him to gross indignities, or refusing to respect his wishes regarding the relief of his suffering, for example?" Hospice views their entire roll with a patient as alleviating suffering and indignity for someone who has accepted the inevitability of their own death. The hospice approach is that death is a natural and good outcome of the process of life. Once a patient has entered a hospice program all life prolongation processes are stopped. The person is "allowed" to die, and is given support with resolving life issues and is often given generous doses of pain medication as needed. I like this philosophy and consider it to be an entirely acceptable choice within our current society. Going to the next step of assisting in someone's choice to end their life will, IMO, be shelved to the section of unresolvables like abortion. Personally, I'm agin' it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next