SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (7400)3/6/2001 12:59:56 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 
Either we persist as individuals, with a life history and memories, or we do not. If we do not, then most of the things we care about are transient and futile

This is really an extraordinarily bizarre notion. Is it futile to take care of a child because that child will eventually die and cease to be aware of all that we did?

I see no relationship whatsoever between transience and futility. If an action has consequence, it is not futile, even if it is transient. D we say that it is futile to eat because we know we will be hungry again tomorrow? Does the certainty of death make the avoidance of pain futile?

We do not know what happens after we die. There is no way that we can know, except by dying. All of us will, sooner or later, and then we will know; I can imagine no greater waste of time than trying to figure it out before then. What we do is not futile because it has consequences here and now, and in the future of the world we inhabit here and now. That's what we know, and that's all that it makes sense to dispute.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext