SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (130466)3/6/2001 1:59:32 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
I have enough doubt about what the ultimate findings will be not to want to make a definitive statement. If there were actual bribery going on, to look the other way, than it is very bad. I am convinced by some of the material I have read that the damage was fairly severe, but, like you, I am no expert. As I understand it, they gained a lot of US codes, compromising our own defenses, and leapt forward about ten or fifteen years in Mirv technology, for example. It seems to me, though, that an assessment of material damage, though important, means less than an assessment of whether the Administration were willing to compromise security for remuneration. That is the part that will need to be sorted through. It seems clear that money was illegally channeled, but we do not know if its source were known, or if there were a tit- for- tat...........
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext