(OT) Ha, ha. Umm, the fact that I was born in arguably the most capitalistic society in the world (no it aint the US) wouldn't enter the equation, no?
As even you have worked out, there might not be the great game plan (as also promoted by Qcom in the past) but more a case of commericial realities (read: economies of scale) and opportunities (note: little to do with superior technology, but it does sometimes help).
You added so much value to the discussion that I wanted to have that I have to wonder who is supplying your material that you are posting or are you my most favoured nemesis "LaFraud" in disguise?
The similarity is there alright: only using approved positive Qcom propaganda and couldn't possibly add anything of your own tuition. Sorry, I meant add something of value to the discussions.
Now I am not having a go at your intelligence, really I am not, but I thought that this was the Nokia thread. No, I am certain as it is right above where I am writing now. Qcom does not influence Nokia a great deal, but I do understand that Nokia can influence Qcom one heck of a lot. So, can I suggest writing more Nok oriented statements on Qcom threads and not Qcom on this one.
Now I am not so opposed to Qcom as some people would think, but the complete airhead posts (bit like forced religion) that i have seen need to have something to give it balance...otherwise we might just as well turn the clock back to 1937/8 and invade Poland. There are some great posters out there that I do not see eye-to-eye with, but certainly value their thoughts and even the ocassional "hand bags at dawn" squables we have had.
And to them thanks for adding infinite value and wisdom.
To the others, try to aspire..... |
