I'm still waiting. What is that difference, in concrete, scientific, irrefutable terms? DNA: corn, check. Human, check. Acquired Info: corn, check. Human, check. Used info: Corn, check. Human, check.
Okay. What IS the difference, then? I've asked you before, but it seems to be not much more than a belief. Are you going to tell me where the first corn came from, and if so, it must have been something OTHER than corn beforehand and acquired and used a new set of skills (coded as DNA), ergo, an intelligent act. You might not agree, but the facts are there.
I'm saying all of this is on a continuum. Rocks, dirt, corn, dogs, cats, cows, chimps, people, and everything else. You are making a binary claim that there are people and everything else. I provide data, you provide empty opinion. If you can't prove it, just say so. I think my proof is pretty good. |
