SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Shread who wrote (2181)3/7/2001 11:04:44 AM
From: DukeCrow  Read Replies (3) of 52237
 
The earliest earnings data I can get on the Nasdaq is from January 1999. Using that earnings data and adjusting the price down to the October 1998 lows, I get an approximate Nasdaq aggregate PE of 36 (38.5 for the Nasdaq-100). This is not very exact since to get an accurate calculation I would need the earnings data for October 1998, but it does give a reference point for comparison.

I think the point you make about all the unprofitable companies now in the Nasdaq is very true. Currently, the Nasdaq's PE is considerably higher than the Nasdaq-100's. In 1998, they were relatively equal. I think it would be more prudent to track the Nasdaq-100's PE at the present time because of all the junk equity that was floated over the last 2 years; that junk really skews the earnings figures.

Also, the Nasdaq-100 is a tradeable index, so it's probably more important to track that than the Nasdaq Comp, anyway.

Ali
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext