SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jeffbas who wrote (12146)3/8/2001 12:41:17 AM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (1) of 78602
 
Trying it your way,Jeffrey, we get:

siliconinvestor.com

Equal dollar weighting would have enabled purchase of more shares of "our" big winner, low price stock GTSI. So the dollar gain is bigger (than with a 1000 sh. purchase); and this dollar gain overcomes less dollar profit on fewer shares that would've been purchased of ICIX and KEM.

Net result is that the portfolio shows a greater gain on invested capital (5 stocks x 10K/ea = $50k)

Personally, my belief is that we have several types of value picks in that portfolio, so I would not be using equal dollar weightings here. GTSI and BAMM were net/nets. I'd want to invest fewer $ in each of these selections than I would in stocks like KEM or LDP that I believe (rightly or wrongly) that I understand better. My original purpose in setting up the list was just to keep track of stocks 3 people here selected and to see if such selections continued to be winners. And maybe to quantify results by number of issues and percentage gain or loss. Having a portfolio and tracking its performance is difficult here because in every case, the 3 people who said they bought, bought at different prices. There is also more arbitrariness when one of the 3 people says he's selling. I have no rule to close out the position. I'm not even sure SI portfolios can show closed out position results.

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext