Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 172.22

-0.6%

9:42 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: foundation who wrote (8366)	3/9/2001 3:57:42 PM
From: Keith Feral	Read Replies (1) of 196543

Projecting is a nice word ... misrepresenting is a better word. When I try to think of QCOM's IPR position in WCDMA vs. CDMA2000, I rememeber one important fact. QCOM charges the same whether a company uses one or all of it's patents. They do not add charges on top of each other like the GSM camp, creating an overload of royalties up to 20%. It's one simple flat fee for QCOM and it's CDMA2000/WCDMA patent portfolio. The little nuances about chip speed don't matter to QCOM's patent portfolio. MOT, ERICY, and NOK have found this out in every court in the US, Korea, Japan, and Europe.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next