Right Wing Extremist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (6103)	3/11/2001 2:28:56 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) of 59480

>>Burton pointed out a problem with The Post's method. If the canvassing board had counted dimpled chads as votes, it would have had to reject the ballots where voters made a clear punch for one candidate and made a dimple for another because that would have meant they voted for two candidates. It is unknown how many ballots would have been disqualified if that had been done. << This is the dirty secret the Dems don't want to confront. If dimples count, then they should count not only in the so-called "undercounts," but in all ballots. But this isn't convenient to the Dem strategy, because it can subtract votes. The strategy is clear - only look at data which can help, deep six data which can hurt. This is a lot of fun for armchair strategists, but it's abysmal historical analysis. Don't tell me who might have won, tell me who got the votes. So far it's Bush, and I don't mean the United States Supreme Court. Every analysis which favors Gore uses language like "might."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next