SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis
SPY 684.83+0.6%Dec 22 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Madarasz who wrote (71756)3/11/2001 8:35:42 PM
From: Sea Otter  Read Replies (4) of 99985
 
A Naz of 1000 is a reasonable fair valuation.

Perhaps a bit simple-minded, but if you apply a
straightforward P/E test on the Naz, we're still
way over-valued. In fact, the Naz comes in around
1000 on that test.

The Naz is now at 105 P/E. Historical average
is 45. So roughly, give or take, the Naz would need
to fall to 1000 to reach fair valuation as judged by
historical P/E averages.

This assumes, of course, that earnings don't tank.
It also assumes that we don't overshoot on the downside.
In other words, a 1000 Naz is not only credible, but
is even optimistic when you consider the historical
and macro context.

I know P/E is considered antiquarian by many. It is
indeed a flawed measure but, even so, it is far
better than the "analysis" you hear from the talking
heads on television. Does anyone actually follow
those people?

I mentioned a Naz of 1000 to some of my trading friends
over the weekend. To a man and woman they were appalled
and said it could never happen. (Most think we're at
the bottom or very close to it). When I stated the
reason for Naz 1000, they didn't know what to think.
People don't even seem to think about P/E anymore.
Instead they think in terms of psychology and mood.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext