SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis
SPY 680.28-0.5%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Crystal ball who wrote (72024)3/13/2001 4:23:00 AM
From: d_trader_99  Read Replies (2) of 99985
 
I blamed Greenspan before: NAZ to 1300!

However, when I go back to exam NASDAQS history, I find that it may not be fair to blame Greenspan. On 1/1/1990, NAS was only 454.8, on 3/12/2001 It was 1924 which was over 300% higher than 11 years ago. If you believe that the stock market could produce normal return, see 6% annually, the NAS would be 864 rather than 1924 today. At 1924, what the annual return do you have? 14%!! Is it bad?

Some people were spoiled these days. Thus, when market goes back normal, they feel very uncomfortable. Used to it. Don't expect to double your money in a week. the GOLDEN TIME may not emerge again.

By the way, if NAS would return to normal return, see 10% annually, the index should be about 1300!!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext