SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance
NTAP 114.97-0.7%11:01 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mtns_and_money who wrote (6959)3/13/2001 1:33:22 PM
From: pirate_200  Read Replies (3) of 10934
 
> "Prudential analyst Kimberly Alexy in a research report cut
> the 2001 earnings estimate to 38 cents a share from a previous
> estimate of 41 cents a share. She also lowered her 2002 earnings
> estimate for Network Appliance to 43 cents a share from 55 cents."

She is saying NTAP will earn .38 this year and .43 next year,
meaning she is saying earnings growth is going to be 13%.

But wait, there's more:

> "Alexy also lowered her price target for the stock to $42 a share
> from $71. The stock is rated a strong buy."

So, she says earnings growth will be 13%, yet she MAINTAINS
a strong buy and sets a $42 target?

If she thinks the growth rate will be 13%, 13 x .43 = $5.59.
Even if it's twice her 13% growth rate, that's only $11
a share, so where does $42 come from? Why maintain a
strong buy? Is Kimberly math-challenged?

Maybe the logic is that these analysts missed their targets
so severely on the high-end, they are now giving ridiculous
low-end targets to compensate?

I don't get it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext