SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Machaon who wrote (131778)3/14/2001 1:18:28 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
Dear barry the logical extension of you desire to combine expression of free speech with other crimes can lead directly to the assertion of the expression is the crime and thus I guess maybe Senatory Byrd should get 10 years for letting the N-word slip out. dumb, stupid, dumber, retarded.

If you feel the penalty for a crime is not correct then you should use you free speech to do what you feel is correct.

Whatever the consequence of an action to me the penalty should be based on the simple concept of intent. If a person meant to do, I don't really care why. Why can be used to show intent but matters not in applying a sanction.

So << Can you provide some examples of crimes and what you think is appropriate. >>

This means you state the crime and the penalty and then say what is wrong with the actual penalty.

In my post I used a crime and the actual sanction. Why is this so impossible for a vacant liberal mind????????????

tom watson tosiwmee
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News