SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 87.20-3.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: REH who wrote (67836)3/15/2001 6:56:57 PM
From: jmac  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
this is very much different than the FUD that went on all day today. There is no ulitmate ruling of fact and law. There is no sumary judgment against RMBS. All that happened was a pre-trial motion to exclude evidence which rmbs lost. "an unidentified source" says that the judge agrees with Inf.'s expert. First, unless this judge didn't learn anything from the conduct of the judge in the msft trial, i doubt he has stated his beliefs to anyone. Further, if the trial hasn't started yet, then Inf's expert testimony hasn't all been heard. all that has been heard is enough for the judge to decide whether the testimony on the particular subject the expert was to testify on will be admissible at trial. FUD FUD and more FUD. Rmbs may lose. But it now doesn't appear that anything really happened yesterday.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext