SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 88.05+1.0%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (67812)3/15/2001 8:00:45 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (3) of 93625
 
Carl, have you seen the 1990 patent? I have not and unless you have the file wrapper, you have not either. So how do you know whether the 1990 addressed only "multiplexed buses", furthermore, if the specification described, for instance an on chip register which operation was not dependent on a multiplex bus, those claims will survive (the fact that INFINEON "claim" they do not use a multiplex bus, a claim that can be easily challenged) and may apply to SDRAM and DDR DRAM. As for DDR there is still the issue of claims directed to "double clocking" which the multiplex bus issue does not relate to.

Zeev
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News