Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin

RMBS 88.13

+1.1%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bilow who wrote (67812)	3/15/2001 9:25:41 PM
From: charred water	Read Replies (1) of 93625

Carl, After reading the Markman briefs, I can not concur with what you said in message 67812. The only reference to the patent of 1990 is that the patents in suit all have the same specification, which is the same as that abandoned application. The briefs argue over the meaning of the term "bus" and other terms. There is no suggestion that any claims that do not use the word "bus" should be construed as though the claim had used that word. The opposing arguments are quite compelling, and I found myself leaning to the argument that I had most recently read. I guess we'll find out what the court thinks soon enough. So, I humbly suggest that in your original post on this manner, that you: - adopted the opinion that Infineon's argument would entirely prevail, and - extrapolated the significance of that decision to affect claims that don't use a contested definition. Perhaps I have misconstrued, or the reasoning is contained in documents other than the Markman briefs. Please clarify if I err. - Greg

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next