Computer Learning Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Computer Learning

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeddie88 who wrote (17688)	3/16/2001 12:32:35 PM
From: mr.mark	Read Replies (2) of 110626

hi sue i have some thoughts, yes. and none particularly earth-shattering. <g3> lots of back and forth on partitions versus new physical drives. i vote for partitioning a drive and loading win2000 on its own partition, but also getting the second physical drive and using it for image back ups. if you wish, you can partition the second physical drive and place an os on there too. right now i have two physical drives. 1st drive is partitioned into c: and f:, where i run win98se and win2000pro respectively. 2nd physical drive is d: and has about 9 uncompressed images of the two os's. soon i'd like to partition the 2nd drive and place an os on it. don't know if this helps... :) mark

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next