SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (132179)3/16/2001 2:02:18 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (3) of 769670
 
James,
The problem in Florida was that every county had to design a ballot that accomodated ten Presidential candidates and every county designed a different ballot because the Florida elections were run on a county-by-county basis. Some counties did a better job of it than others. Some counties did a terrible job.

No one has claimed that the Palm Beach ballot was badly designed on purpose, just that there is clear evidence that it was badly designed and the net effect hurt Gore.

As for the write-in candidate, this particular ballot seems to have been ambiguously worded; most ballots say "Other candidate (write in name)" or something to that effect. Filling in the ballot should not involve trick questions.

Here's a hypothetical question for you: what if you had a ballot that was so badly designed that the wrong candidate won the election, e.g. 80% of the Republicans voted for the Socialist Worker's Party candidate by mistake, and he won the election? Would you throw out that election? or would you still maintain that it was the voter's fault? How bad does it have to be before you say that it wasn't just the voter's fault?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext