PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (132176)	3/16/2001 3:35:10 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) of 769667

I am not sure what you mean by the statement it is “not so fine to make a bad situation less tolerable without actual social harm.” The actual social harm occurs when society is forced to embrace what is fundamentally foreign to itself. Individuals comprise society. Those individuals by nature are heterosexual (i.e. they ALL originate of two haploid sets of chromosomes, one set coming ALWAYS from a paternal source, the other coming ALWAYS from a maternal source. The fact of heterosexuality is literally imprinted on each cell of their bodies). There is only one way this occurs—by the biological joining of exactly one man and one woman (this is ultimately true even with cloning). All other combinations are foreign to human biological identity and thus to human society. Society then is preserved and promoted by heterosexuality. Society’s obligation to itself is in preserving and promoting the heterosexual biological identity. Society has no obligation whatever to support any other sexual orientation because all other orientations are foreign to the human biological nature that defines human society and upon which society depends. No logic exists to force society to accept what is fundamentally foreign to it. I have no problem with homosexuals having sex in the privacy of their homes. That is their right and it comes to them by virtue of their human right to privacy. But they have no right to access society’s essentially heterosexual social and material infrastructure as a direct result of their behavior and/or “orientation.” Society has no part with homosexuality. Its obligation is to its own nature. When homosexuals demand social recognition of their relationships, they aim to force upon society acceptance of a human relationship having absolutely no reflection of the biological reality that comprises us all. What they aim to do is exactly as ridiculous as society’s acceptance of polygamy or bestiality. Both these orientations are as foreign to human biology as homosexuality and thus are not logically supportable by human society. Whether the homosexual would suffer sexual deprivation is not the point. The point concerns whether society should embrace homosexuality as a healthy reflection of humanity. It clearly is a distorted reflection of humanity. It is true that we commonly ease the suffering of the afflicted in our society, but we do this because we compare them to what is normal and respond from compassion. We yet reject the affliction itself, even reserving the right to discriminate against them. We aim to treat alcoholics and blind people and in certain contexts deem them inappropriate candidates for employment. Moreover, senses such as sight do not comment on human biological origin and identity as does sex. A defect in the eye represents only a corruption of sight. A defect in sexual orientation represents a corruption of human identity and origin.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next