SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1265)3/20/2001 9:01:32 AM
From: dantecristo  Read Replies (1) of 12465
 
Jeff: I am not sure this will answer your question, but I believe that in mid-1999 the Federal Courts first allowed SLAPP motions to be brought in Federal Court. (See Newsham v. Lockheed Missiles and Space Co., Inc. (1999, 9th Cir.) 190 F.3d. 963).
casp.net
Yes, you are absolutely right that as SLAPP plaintiffs get more and more adept at masking SLAPPs the more difficult it becomes for SLAPP defendants to recognize a wolf in sheep's clothing. Hopefully this thread and the johndoes.org helps to raise the knowledge base for those posting on Internet financial message boards. And hopefully our case in the California Court of Appeals will set a precedent to at least deter Internet financial message board SLAPPs in California.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News