Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 49.25

+0.9%

Feb 3 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: greenspirit who wrote (24200)	6/8/1997 2:22:00 PM
From: Muthusamy SELVARAJU	of 186894

Recently, I have been wondering how much of a 'force' IBM is with its RS60000 RISC microprocessor architecture. In Europe, they seem to be getting good press about the AS/400 machines (called Advanced Series) which will soon run Windows NT. (There is also talk that they will be able to allow NT to run on their mainframes too). So, the basic question to pose to people on the Intel thread here is whether there have been previous technical comparisons made between the RS6000 architecture and the latest Intel microprocessors, and who has the advantage over the long haul. And what factors do we need to take into account when making such a comparison. IBM is now on a roll, and we seem to be focused so much on AMD/Cyrix, I wondered if we should not talk about RS6000 too... Grateful for all your comments. Regards,

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next