Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!

LRCX 156.19

+0.1%

12:42 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (9557)	3/21/2001 10:38:40 AM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (2) of 10921

I notice how vitrually every day CNBC has people on who will help make your portfolio more defensive. More defensive after a 65% market drop?!?! Isn't it a bit late for this? It would be absurd if if weren't so comical. Yeah, I pointed that out on my site the other day when more and more are saying they are scared and want to sell. What has MORE risk for a portfolio? NASDAQ 5100 or NASDAQ 1881? Why are people MORE scared NOW than they were at NASDAQ 5100? Just normal, human reaction that you have to learn to do the opposite of if you want to make money. I remember when Bagley bought some LRCX at $24 (pre 3:1 split) and it kept going down.. I think you and others bought at $15 or $17 and I said I really didn't see a reason for it to stop going down so I would TRY to sit on my hands longer as we dropped below book value...I had a small position I Paid $25 for from a previous cycle. I started to buy at $12 and bought more at $10 before it bottomed just above my next buy point of $8! (remember, these prices are all pre split!) Well, today even Bagley's buy of LRCX at $24 (now $8) look darned smart with the stock at $24 as we are only talking about the Summer - Fall of 1998 for these buys! Kirk out

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next