International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steve Huskey who wrote (11516)	6/8/1997 4:35:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	of 35569

Steve, if your second possible scenario of an additional price collapse after the AGM becomes the fact, what do we tell responsibly to all these people like David F. that bought in the low teens? If this is indeed one of the possible scenarios (let say without conclusive externally verified proof of .25 oz/ton Au extractable at let say, less than $50/ton of ore (we were told less than $25/ton)), should not Lew and CL include some caveat in their postings of the great future awaiting us, even if the final scene is absolute salvation richess and elation. How many lurking David will throw theu stock in disgust if 5 is breached? How many more if 4 is breached, will you stay in when I step in under 3? It is extremely difficult to see an investment go down 50%, it is torture to see it go down 60% and unfair punishment under the US constitution to se it drop to less than 70% of its initial value. Responsible posters should therefore make clear that such an eventuality exists, even if very remotely, and not lead all the lurkers like lamb to the altar. Zeev PS rereading my post caused me to relax my itchy finger on this trigger <VBG>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next