SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (132699)3/22/2001 11:43:30 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
In the case of celibacy, nature is sacrificed to supernatural goals. In the case of sterility, it depends upon how, when, and why.

Additionally, natural sterility and celibacy are no actions and since morality is concerned with thought and action these conditions cannot be included in any moral judgement. They simply reflect a status of an individual who has rights in civilized society by virtue of his/her individual humanity. They should not have rights by virtue of their celibacy and sterility, just as homosexuals should not have rights by virtue of their homosexuality. But hetero married couples should certainly have rights by virtue of their marriages because such marriages reflect and promote who we are-- unlike any other. Even the hetero couple that cannot reproduce by nature reflects who we are and can adopt to consistently mirror to their children their fundamental human nature. Homosexual couples simply cannot do this. They will consistently reflect a distortion of human nature to children. This is but one of myriad reasons why such "unions" should not be normalized in society.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext