SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (132798)3/23/2001 12:29:24 AM
From: RON BL  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
"There can be no doubt that marriage has historically existed, not for the protection of the parties involved in the marriage but for the protection of children. "

Not entirely !!! Marriage has also existed for the protection of society at large. Marriage was considered a taming influence on the male to help curb the lecherous beast. <ggg> The other choice is complete promiscuity and the problems it brings. Liberals are very fond of ignoring the intense forces that sex brings into play. These are not always positive. We see this today with the intense amount of deadly disease in the gay community where surrender to the sexual impulse is most prominent. We also see the disastrous effects on raising children without a father very prominently in the black community. As the role of the father has diminished in this community, we have seen a proportionate escalation of violence from its youth.

Saying that sex between a husband and wife is rape and exploring wife swapping and all sorts of liberal ideas are very prominent today. The liberal dogma is that sex will set you free. However we have not seen anything positive from it unless you consider broken families and disease wonderful.

The next step which has already begun is the exploitation of children. We have begun to project our own sexual images and fantasies with younger and younger children attempting to portray them as naturally sexual. The ultimate goal of this is the attempt to sanction sex between adults and children. The next sexual frontier. Of course we just heard about the PETA member who against eating animals stated that sex with animals was good. I'm sure that he is against marriage though.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News