SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CommanderCricket who wrote (2308)3/23/2001 8:30:18 AM
From: Think4Yourself  Read Replies (1) of 23153
 
Thanks for the feedback. Since they appear to have the cash to pay their bills it sounds like it may be a business policy. Customer doesn't pay ACTM, ACTM doesn't pay suppliers. Suppliers go to cash on demand to ACTM, ACTM goes to cash on demand to customers. Their action, and your companies response, both make perfect business sense. Given their margins how can ACTM eat the consequences of their customers poor planning? Admittedly, why should the suppliers either? It's the end customer who screwed up. As an investor I would prefer to see my companies pass through problems rather than eating them. It may tick off their suppliers but it keeps the company in business and as profitable as possible.

The entire industry is having problems right now, and it is priced into the stocks. No one is claiming anyone is exempt. As long as ACTM is getting new customers, which they are, I am not overly concerned.

Did you notice if the facility was active?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News