SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 88.13+1.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (69037)3/24/2001 2:08:08 PM
From: NightOwl  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Hi Zeev,

That post was made with tongue firmly planted in cheek and I have no reason to doubt that Crisp was telling the truth. I was just poking fun at the way he did it.

In truth when a witness says "I don't know" something and then proceeds to give his best "guess" when he hasn't been asked for such speculation, I usually begin to throw up.<vbg>

But regardless of whether Crisp left RMBS in '96 or '00, there is no rule which would have precluded him RMBS or its lawyers from talking to him before his deposition and I would be very surprised if they didn't. Those "discussions could probably be inquired into in the course of his deposition, but perhaps not completely on the topic of what he did or knew at the time he was at RMBS.

Either way if such discussions were proper, IMHO their disclosure could have been no worse for RMBS than the testimony reported here.

0|0
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext