SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 90.19+2.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim kelley who wrote (69119)3/25/2001 10:38:21 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Hi jim kelley; I can find hundreds of references in the literature to the fact that unissued claims can't be enforced. Why don't you find me one reference that says unissued claims can be enforced?

I think that what you're mistaking is that while abandoned patents (with unissued claims) cannot be enforced, the filing date of the abandoned patent can be used for the purpose of determining prior art.

So here's my statement again: "First of all, since the claims in the 1990 document are not public, Infineon (or you and I) cannot be held to infringe them."

Please find a single reference that says otherwise.

Oh, here are a couple references that agree with me:

This hurts both the patentholder who can't enforce unissued patents and potential infringers who won't know about them.
heckel.org

In some countries, such as Japan, published applications are respected almost as though they were already issued patents, and can provide licensing opportunities. This local custom can make an unissued patent application valuable even if the national patent office has a reputation for letting patent applications pend for a long time.
slwk.com

-- Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext