SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: thames_sider who wrote (9741)3/26/2001 5:40:04 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) of 82486
 

If you're referring to quantum effects; there, the concept of observer influence
is understood, and can be - as it were - quantified..


My understanding, though I'm not a physicist, is that observer influence is a reandom influence, and can never really be discounted.

But there are physicists here who can answer better than I can.

Philosophically, science in the past 200 or so years has taken on some of the roles which religion had in earlier societies. It also takes on many of the attributes of religion. The belief in unity, the belief in interconnectedness, the belief that if you do the rituals / experiments in the right way you will get the right results, etc. We like to think that science is -- well, more scientific than religion. I'm not sure that's true. I think we may just have replaced one belief system with another, both having complete validity within their own set of parameters, neither being sufficient unto itself to explain the mysteries of the universe, of life, of self-awareness, of what happens to us after death.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext