SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (9797)3/26/2001 8:21:05 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
But that doesn't answer it.

The way I heard it doesn't concern itself so much with time as with the distance. As you noted, before it can get to the target it must get to the half-way point. Before it can get from there to the target it must get to the new half-way point. Since a line, mathematically, has an infinite number of points, and there is always a mid-point between wherever the arrow is and the target which the arrow must get to first, there is no point at which it can stop progressing from where it is to the new mid point, and therefore there is no point at which it can actually get to the target.

Mathematically there is no uncertainty in where the arrow is. If you start off at 100 meters, then you must pass the 50 meter point, the 25 meter, the 12.5 meter, and so on. You can keep subdividing indefinitely -- there is no limit to that. It must pass through an infinite number of points -- and, in fact, an infinite number of points between each two of the infinite number of points. (You are, I assume, aware that there are different quantities of infinity?)

You don't answer the paradox, you just sluff it over. Go back and prove to me mathematically how it can progress past the last half-point to the target.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext