SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 38.44+0.7%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (130929)3/27/2001 3:12:32 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Hi Jim, GV's article articulates the concern, I'll paraphrase:

Adjusting interest rates may not work

The normal fix may not work

The Economist's article makes it clear that this is unchartered territory for the US since 1945:

All recessions since 1945 have been "interest rate induced recessions courtesy of the Feds." Thus, interest rate adjustments could get us out of any recession after 1945. (ALL is significant).

Interest rates fixed an "interest rate induced recession."

Interest rates fixed everything after 1945.

However, prior to 1945, the normal USA business cycle was an "investment bust induced recession" where interest rates do not have an impact.

That's a concern to me because our normal fix won't work, which is why I asked GV how do they fix an investment bust induced recession, which was the USA's normal type of business cycle prior to 1945? Liquidity?

The average inv-induced recession lasted 22 months. No wonder I read that Intel put a fab on hold until 2002.

RE: "Wait a few months for the dust to settle."

I'm assuming this could last 2 years.

RE: "In the mean time don't stop with the development end."

Heavens no. Of course not.

I don't think a big company can fight the economy, where enormous volume is the game, but I think a startup can fight it, especially one that's starting out.

Regards,
Amy J
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext