SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 88.13+1.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: blake_paterson who wrote (69342)3/29/2001 11:59:14 AM
From: gnuman  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Blake, re:I suspect the agreements are "Version Lite", given Hyundai's stated hopes of shipping an aggregate amount of only US$380MM DDR this year...

Assuming they're supplying 128MB DIMM's, I'd guess it's about 5 Million modules.
Not a big chunk of segment compared to what Samsung, Micron and Infineon will probably ship this year. And I doubt if Hyundai has a "sole source" Agreement.

BTW, I've been thinking about Intel's public position on P4/Brookdale/Sdram. It could be a marketing/semantics game.
DDR is a Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory.
(Just as when people refer to the "DRAM market" they really mean all flavors of DRAM; DRAM, SDRAM, DRDRAM, DDRSDRAM, etc).
I note that while Rambus speculated Intel would show lousy performance figures for P4/SDRAM at spring IDF, it didn't happen. IMO, not because they weren't lousy, but because Intel isn't going to support it on P4. (I guess Mooring was right about the performance). <g>
Seem's to me that DDR has gone from "unstable for PC's", to Major PC makers supporting it in products. I think Intel is forced to support it. I also don't see anyplace that P4/Sdram could be fit into desk top product segmentation.
JMO's
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext