I understand your thinking. But I have to disagree. Money has always been a part of our election process from the very beginning. Character matters when electing someone.
One of the things I believe the media has been remiss in examining is a person character prior to an election. And I'm not talking about who-slept-with-who. I'm talking about their style of leadership, do they fire people at a whim, are they even tempered, honest, decent people. In other words, are they assholes looking for power, or are they people who can be trusted, who have the best interest of the nation at heart. It's not an exact science, but the media could certainly do a lot better than it has.
Unfortunately, the major media only focus on a persons political party, instead of who they are as individuals.
Term limits would help. I actually think the Democrat congress created this problem with their last "reform" measure which limited individual contributions, but not PAC contributions. On second thought, it wasn't until the Democrats found the "soft money" loophole, that PAC dollars started to flow.
What's really the problem though? Is it perception, or reality? Has any politician come forward and said. "I changed my vote because I wanted to receive a PAC donation"? Has John McCain admitted as much? No, what they might say is, I think the other guy is corrupt and changes his vote based on PAC donations. Well, if they know who these people are, or think they know, stop playing good-old-boy party politics and call them on the carpet for it!
Then the question is. Why don't they do this? Why don't they call fellow members of congress on the carpet for changing votes for PAC dollars? I would argue, it's because the place has become a country club for the elite, who want to receive the power and perks of the office their entire life. So, they take the path of least resistance and become a part of the system which rewards certain kinds of behavior.
Remove this reward mechanism with term limits, and perhaps our perception of corruption over time would decrease as well. |
