SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (134189)3/30/2001 4:44:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
But more than that, if one wants to reduce costs somewhat, the proposal to establish Medical Accounts similar to IRAs, with a certain amount for ordinary care deposited in pre- tax dollars, and the carrying of various forms of catastrophic insurance, would be a good way to go.

Eyuup. That could work, but even this sort of plan will take a bit of discipline. "Health accounts" will make us more directly responsible for paying healthcare costs, and vast numbers of us will simply exhaust whatever meager dollar amounts (relative to cost) we are able to put in those accounts. Let’s face it, medical care is essentially a product like any other, and its costs will not be reduced until its demand is reduced-- whatever arrangements we fashion.

It seems to me we need to consider ways we as a society might better work to decrease healthcare demand. Perhaps we could, for example, plan our communities to better facilitate exercise as part of daily living and not as an abstraction of life. Surely it is a broad approach, but it points to the root of the problem. If we continue to ignore the problem's root, then I don't see how any of the healthcare proposals commonly mentioned could do much better than our current system in the face of escalating healthcare demand.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext