Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (135503)	4/2/2001 3:17:15 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 1578563

Do you have difficulty with English comprehension, or are you purposely playing dense? If its the latter, let me know and I will stop posting. I had no problem with English comprehension until your last post (quoted above) which seems totally unrelated to our previous conversation. I was argueing that CO2 is not a pollutant. I said it was uubiquitous and non-toxic. You replied that "sometimes too much of a good thing can be toxic. I replied that like water or nitrogen we can suffocate if surrounded by it but that CO2 is not toxic, "not on the levels that we encounter it on earth, or even at much higher levels." You talk about how too much of a good thing can be bad. You give the examples of O2, water, and hot fudge sundaes. Those provide perfect examples of examples of non-toxic, non pollutants that can be bad if you have too much of them. Thus unless you are maintaining that O2, H2O and hot fuge sundaes are toxic pollutants you support my arguement that CO2 is not toxic or a pollutant. I didn't say that it can't be a bad thing if we have to much, I said it was not toxic and not a pollutant. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next