>> incredibly harassing << ?
Do I get this right? Rick points out, fairly mildly by the standards of debate on SI, that your claims about what you said a year ago might be rather different than what you now claim, and provides a link to a post of yours that seems in conflict to those claims, and you regard this as harassment? I think of this as debate.
While your predictions are being put in context, note this post, by you, reciting some of your history:
Message 15361447
>> Clearly, subsequent to my post, Harmon ran to Jeff like an aggrieved four year old crying to his mommy. <<
Your confident and supposedly "factual presentation" gets this wrong. Rick did not report you to the SI TOU people -- or at least, I know who did, and it was someone other than Rick.
Rick hardly needs help in spirited debate, but you should know that your, to put it gently, combative and name-calling style (and your dubious history) put off a lot of people who might otherwise read and consider your posts.
--RCM |
