SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 99.85+6.2%Nov 24 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: d:oug who wrote (66858)4/5/2001 4:59:04 AM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (1) of 116764
 
I read the entire Sennholz essay at his site: sennholz.com
Lots of good stuff in addition to a few paragraphs on gold.

He correctly states what bullion banks have done: "borrowed large quantities of gold from various central banks at rates of one percent or less, then sold it for U.S. dollars and invested the proceeds in U.S. Treasuries at 6 percent or higher."

And states the obvious risk - "Such transactions obviously are very profitable but rather risky and potentially ruinous if the price of gold should soar beyond the level at which it was sold, or the gold loan rate should rise and the Treasury rates should fall"

I can easily agree with both of the above statements (neither of which are pro-gata or anti-gata). The article does not indicate the actions of the bullion banks are either good or bad, but just points out the inherent risks of such transactions.

P.S. Sorry I did not reply sooner, I was busy manipulating my website <grin>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext