SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
CSCO 77.23-0.2%9:49 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stock Farmer who wrote (51162)4/8/2001 2:03:27 AM
From: john dodson  Read Replies (1) of 77398
 
John,

Point taken. No matter how big the cash pile, it can't last forever if it must sustain the company in the face of neverending deterioration. However, I do not particularly subscribe to the neverending part. But one never knows. Besides, no CFO would let a company burn its cash reserve to extinguishment with other options staring the company in the face. CSCO's already frozen acquisitions, which admittedly are mostly financed as stock swaps, but they've also done some symbolic cost cutting. Not to mention the fact that the company is still pretty profitable.

Actually cash+equivs and short term investments, which are nearly as good as cash, were about $4.78 billion at Q2/01's end, down about $1.6 billion from the previous quarter. However, one quarter does not a trend make. Case in point, Cisco's history of closing cash+sti numbers:
q/yr - Total Cash+STI (millions)
q2/01 - $4,782
q1/01 - $6,391
q4/00 - $5,525
q3/00 - $4,653
q2/00 - $3,698
q1/00 - $1,765
q2/99 - $1,851
q1/99 - $2,307

My main point was simply that CSCO has more than enough cash to weather a pretty sizable storm. And as you mentioned no debt and relative financial strength compared to competitors. Question is how much cheaper will it get? I don't claim to know, but I do know that it's cheap enough for me to continue nibbling on.

Good luck!

-John
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext