SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1252)4/10/2001 9:10:15 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) of 12465
 
Re: 4/10/01 - [TVCP] Johndoes.org: Court Affirms Earlier Ruling In John Does Case

LesLFrench
Veteran Reporter
User # 3
User Rated:

posted 04-10-2001 06:51 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A U.S. District Court Judge has affirmed an earlier federal magistrate's ruling that Les L. French, co-founder of John Does Anonymous Foundation ("Foundation"), is indeed entitled to appear, answer, and assert claims against Michael J. Zwebner and others in a lawsuit that Zwebner filed against the Foundation.

The Hon. Dennis J. Hubel had previously ruled that French was entitled to appear and bring counterclaims, but the plaintiff, Zwebner, filed a Rule 72(a) motion to overturn the decision. A Rule 72(a) objection is similar to an "appeal" in that the standard of review is the same; that is, Zwebner would have to prove that Judge Hubel erred in his ruling. The court's opinion can be found at ecf.ord.uscourts.gov

The ruling was the latest in a series of failures encountered by Zwebner in this case. Two weeks ago, the court determined that a prima facie hearing would not be held to bring a default judgment against the foundation, and that the entire case would advance to trial.

In the lawsuit, Zwebner accuses the Foundation of publishing a newspaper article which was published in a British newspaper four years ago, which Zwebner claims is defamatory. Defendant Les French claims that the article reprint was in fact obtained from pleadings that Zwebner himself filed with a London court.

French has filed counterclaims against Zwebner and others alleging abuse of process, breach of contract, and defamation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 247 | From: Portland, Oregon USA | Registered: Mar 2000

newsop.net
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext