SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.050+1.9%1:41 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (10436)4/12/2001 2:36:19 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (2) of 34857
 
OT Thanks for this one here:

"Investing is usually also a question on who
takes what proportion of the gain, and what proportion
of the loss,.."

I have always tried to explain that higher education is an investment and as such must not be provided by governments, which should have concentrated the funds in basic education.

But this what you wrote prove me right:
(I'm talking about developing countries here)
If investing is a question of who takes what proportion of the gain, leads us to believe that governments invest money in higher education -which is expensive- and the guy with the diploma reaps all gains.

This because in certain countries (according to OECD) governments invest ten times more in higher education than in basic education. Thus leaving the mass of the population with the loss and subsidizing the cost of state universities.

As a result, a high disparity in income is a result of high disparity in investment in education.

By the way: I dropped out high school because I learned very early the dirty little secrets of developing countreis school system.

I think I would never ever be as good with a loaded Cal. 45 than I am at building GSM networks. Besides the life spam here is longer.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext