Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Boca_PETE who wrote (13665)	4/12/2001 1:44:33 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) of 42834

>>which neither confirms nor denies that you were the source that sparked Kangus's UTEK-conflict of interest question<< pete, imho, you are reaching. it was CLEARLY not kirk's intent to "spark" a UTEK question. there is no reasonable and rational doubt of that. only unreasonable and irrational doubt. to BLAME kirk, or hold him ACCOUNTABLE in any way is a joke. if this isn't self evident by now, nothing i say can help. >>This personal attack reflects your true character perfectly.<< >>But as for credibility, in my book yours has been right down there with your idol, Clinton for most of the time I've been posting SI<< pete, you just said kirk had poor character for equating you to clinton and then you equate kirk to clinton - IN THE SAME POST. simple logic dictates that you MUST also have the same poor character for your personal attack that you attribute to kirk for his personal attack. come on, you were WRONG to indict kirk for utek. WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. period. take some responsibility for being WRONG. just b/c bob ducks and dodges responsibility for his HORRID calls doesn't give you license to enter the illogical and irrational to avoid personal accountability.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next