SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BEA Systems (BEAS) - Undiscovered Growth Stock

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: junjun dator who started this subject4/12/2001 3:49:21 PM
From: lml  Read Replies (2) of 2477
 
It is apparent from the recent postings here since my last visit is that the shorts here are here to offer nothing than to shove what they think is positive news for them in your face, as if we (have some long position) can't read the wires. It is apparent that some like to add their stupid comments like the one found at Message 15649551

What these folks fail to realize that many holding a long position in this stock don't sit in front of their PC screens all day and have a somewhat less interest in the stock on a day-to-day basis, but rather a longer one that goes beyond the next Q or two. That said, IMHO, these latest downgrades are POSITIVE in the longer term, as if these folks had any clue about this company, it is INEVITABLE that the rating on the Company will be UPGRADED again. The FACT SSB's downgrade today barely had an effect on today's price is testimony to the true and lasting effect of these latest downgrades --- minimal. If anything, a downgrade NOW, by mostly less than leading analysts is more like putting powder in BEAS' keg for the longer run. To cite Pru, for example, one has to only look to see that the analyst following BEAS is clearly behind the curve, as most of the front-running analysts downgraded BEAS in the Fall when it made more sense. To downgrade BEAS at this point, IMHO, is laughable, but then again so are the lion's share of these analysts.

As far as Mama Bear, she (or he, but who really cares) is and should be placed on ignore. She (let's call her that) is clearly here only to incite tension, to stir up trouble, and as demonstrated herself to be a complete loser, who has nothing better to do.

And Spy, is that all you can do at this point, is harp on the post to you that you didn't like, but SURELY deserved? If anything, my confrontation with you PROVED you are full of crap. First you're short; then backpedal and declare your long -- and we're supposed to believe your BS.

To others who don't care for my posts, or any others here, you are also free to place me on ignore. Its amazing how many less confident people come out of the woodwork become so quick to jump on somebody when they think the crowd is behind them. This is the Internet; it don't work like that. Each of you is an individual and can control who or what you want to see here. So, if you don't like what's being said, or who is saying it, PUT THEM ON IGNORE. But quit your griping here. You are just adding to the problem that you don't wish to see.

Who knows? Maybe some of you should put yourself on ignore . . . that's my advice to Mama Bear.

Later.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext