SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonkie who wrote (138394)4/14/2001 6:04:12 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
More attempts at spin, All post in the following description by their time line were never changed in any manner between post and you lying in the reporting of what was said.

you are trying once again to cut and paste and squirm some justification. In addition you by
previous post new of the subject and context of the post to which I was responding.
Your continued need to fudge suggests to me that my assumption about why you interpreted my
post the way you did is based on you own personal fantasies. The truth in my assessment makes
you very defensive.
My post in total.
Either you are a liar. Your direct statement. since the Watson kid said he thinks libraries
should have private areas for people who want to view pornography at the library.

In my post that you lie about what I said, I don't use the word private,
pornagraphy, or view and I make no suggestion that anyone should be allowed to view
pornography. When you first tried to justify your lie you only partially took the entire post.

The entire post.
Well Mike, my solution is to have a video camera that takes in the screen and the computer
users with a time stamp that can be used with logging software to show who was at the
computer and what they did. A sign should clearly indicate that this is being done. Unless a
library creates a limited access adult area then this should be done.

The clear meaning and intent of the post was to eliminate the possibility of children being
exposed to adult material by intent or accident. The only way to prevent intentional
exposure of children is to create high risk of sanction environment.

The reason to have restricted access with no cameras is so that adults have access to
ligitmate privacy for e-commerse and whatever. What kind of person only equates an area
that restricts the access of children with one purpose the viewing of pornography.

So I guess if you wish to claim that you are not lying I interpret that fact that the only use
you see for a restricted area is viewing pornography. This one would infer is based on your
own personal computer use pattern in public libraies. The fact that my post was discussing
protecting children and this suggested to zonkie viewing pornography, I guess I wonder
about another part of your person. The extent that you had to defend what you said shows
the degree and strength of your sexual proclivities and focus.

OR. you are not a liar, you are a coward, a closet pervert, or just the plain stupid zonkie or
all.

tom watson tosiwmee
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News