PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: zonkie who wrote (138466)	4/14/2001 9:15:35 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	of 769667

Retard, here are the facts. Why do I consider zonkie a liar and a stupid liar. This is zonkies last post in total That doesn't surprise me a bit jl. What does your money say his answer would be to my asking whether he changed a post after I responded to it, if he answered me of course? This response is to this message. Message 15663470 The original reason I call zonkie a liar is because of this post. Message 15657859 gao seng who wrote (137981) From: zonkie Thursday, Apr 12, 2001 10:55 PM But, tell me about this drivers license that you proposed. I think it's the best idea I have heard a right winger come up with since the Watson kid said he thinks libraries should have private areas for people who want to view pornography at the library. The boldfaced lie shown above was justified by zookie because I said the following. 10 days earlier. In the beginning I posted Message 15601258 Monday, Apr 2, 2001 5:21 PM the whole post. Well Mike, my solution is to have a video camera that takes in the screen and the computer users with a time stamp that can be used with logging software to show who was at the computer and what they did. A sign should clearly indicate that this is being done. Unless a library creates a limited access adult area then this should be done The above was posted in response to a concern expressed about children being accidently and by possible intent to porn in a public library. So Zookie says that he feels his interpretation is legitimate as what I posted was unclear to zookie. Is zookie unfamiliar with who I am and my past posts as a reference to what I might mean or is zookie obsessed with me in some sick way. This post of zookie that lists dozens of my previous posts. For what purpose Message 15592181 I submit that this demonstrates zookie knows exactly what I stand for and purposely lied about what I had said. In zookies latest ranting there is reference to my changing some previous post. I submit that this is just really stupid lies to distract from the obvious. The lie constructed by zookie was posted 10 days from my original post. It does not take an engineer to see all the lies. tom watson tosiwmee

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next